Purchasing a replacement or backup NB-2LH Battery for your Canon?
Canon NB-2LH VS Generic
I have the Canon Rebel XT and take tons of photos. I decided to get a backup battery for my XT and was very worried about purchasing something Generic instead of the actual Canon NB-2LH. I did some research and here's what I found:
1. JUICE: The original NB-2lh has 750mAh - the generics usually have somewhere between 1000 to 1500mAh. mAh is the amount of "Juice" that the battery can hold - it stands for mili amp hour. Thus the generics can usually hold more Juice! This does not hurt your camera - just allows it to run longer! -- I have the 1500mA, and although it doesn't really last twice as long as the 750, it still definitely lasts longer - probably about 25-50% longer.
2. RECHARGE: The original NB-2LH took around 1 hr to 1.5 hrs to recharge to full capacity. The Generic still only takes around 1.5 hrs to recharge, even with the higher mAh.
3. DURABILITY: I have had the generic battery for over a year now and it still retains it's charge for the same amount of time and still charges in the same amount of time. No apparant degredation.
4. COST $$$$: The original NB-2LH will usually cost over $40 and you can get a 1500mAh Generic for less than $10 AFTER shipping.
OVERALL
I found that when all things are compared it was a no-brainer. The Generic NB-2LH was the better purchase overall. It lasts longer, performs just as well, and costs a whole lot less. You can even get it bundled with a spare charger or other accessories for not much more $. And if you get 2 or 3, you can save quite a bit on shipping. It is definitely a smart purchase.
Good luck and God bless!


Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our