Playstation has invested its roll on how to perfect gaming doing thinks such as blu-ray disc developement. Aside from making buyer pay for their built-in blu-ray player, they want to layer games with blu-ray discs too. This may be good in some cases to perfect a frame rate, but games take much longer for developement to provide quality that is nearly the same as a dvd layered game. This is why the developement of exclusive titles (titles released on only one system) for PS3 is very poor. Games like Killzone will take forever to come out just to prove a point that the console can do slightly better, but that is at the sacrifice of many additional exclusive titles that Sony does not have. HD gaming is defined by playing games in HD meaning 720p-1080p. Inproving frame rates is similar to trading in a year old HDTV to get the exact same one a year later.
The multiplatform games for PS3 cost more because the system lacks exclusives. There for Microsoft's prices are lower in stores such as gamestop for the exact same game! When you write down the exclusive games and compare the two systems, Xbox 360 is on top. That is the reason that more 360's are sold. PS3 can compete because it has the built-in blu-ray player, but Sony's recent player released is only $300 ($100 less than the cheapest retail PS3) so expect the gap to get bigger. The Nintendo DS has sold twice as much a Xbox 360, PS3, Wii, and PSP combines, but remember that DS's and Wii's sell because parents look for the cheapest products. That is why the PS2 is dominant still after all these years.
If you are looking for the best gaming experience it is with 360, its just your choice to decide if you want it. I've already experimented with all 3 of these systems since they came out and the game libraries are not comparable and that is the reason why you buy a system, FOR GAMES!
Thank you for voting. If your vote meets our 